Skip to content
Their Record
Joseph Crowley

Joseph Crowley on Taxes

DemocratNY

Taxes165 votes · 64.2/100 consistent
Raise revenueCut taxes

427 roll calls on this member’s record are tagged Taxes. 165 of them counted toward the score above: 87 toward “Raise revenue” and 78 toward “Cut taxes”.

The other 262 did not count: 262 were roll calls whose direction on this issue could not be read confidently — mostly procedural motions — and 0 were ones they did not cast a yea or nay on. They are listed below anyway, marked as not scored, because a filtered list of votes is not a voting record.

DateWhat was voted onVotedCounted as
2000-06-09Death Tax Elimination Act — H R 8 QUESTION: ON MOTION TO RECOMMIT WITH INSTRUCTIONS DEATH TAX ELIMINATION ACTH.R. 8 · 106th Congress · On Motion to Recommit with InstructionsYeaDirection not readable
2000-06-09H R 8 AUTHOR(S): RANGEL OF NEW YORK SUBSTITUTE AMENDMENT QUESTION: ON AGREEING TO THE AMENDMENT DEATH TAX ELIMINATION ACTH.R. 8 · 106th Congress · On Agreeing to the AmendmentYeaDirection not readable
2000-06-08Providing consideration of H.R 8; To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to phaseout the estate and gift Taxes over a 10-year period — H RES 519 QUESTION: ON AGREEING TO THE RESOLUTION PROVIDING CONSIDERATION OF H.R 8; TO AMEND THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986 TO PHASEOUT THE ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES OVER A 10-YEAR PERIODH.Res. 519 · 106th Congress · On Agreeing to the ResolutionNayDirection not readable
2000-06-08Providing consideration of H.R 8; To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to phaseout the estate and gift Taxes over a 10-year period — H RES 519 QUESTION: ON ORDERING THE PREVIOUS QUESTION PROVIDING CONSIDERATION OF H.R 8; TO AMEND THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986 TO PHASEOUT THE ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES OVER A 10-YEAR PERIODH.Res. 519 · 106th Congress · On Ordering the Previous QuestionNayDirection not readable
2000-05-25To Amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to Repeal the Excise Tax on Telephone and Other Communication Services — H R 3916 QUESTION: ON PASSAGE TO AMEND THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986 TO REPEAL THE EXCISE TAX ON TELEPHONE AND OTHER COMMUNICATION SERVICESH.R. 3916 · 106th Congress · On PassageYeaCut taxes
2000-05-25To Amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to Repeal the Excise Tax on Telephone and Other Communication Services — H R 3916 QUESTION: ON MOTION TO RECOMMIT WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO AMEND THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986 TO REPEAL THE EXCISE TAX ON TELEPHONE AND OTHER COMMUNICATION SERVICESH.R. 3916 · 106th Congress · On Motion to Recommit with InstructionsYeaDirection not readable
2000-05-25Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 3916, to Amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to Repeal the Excise Tax on Telephone and Other Communication Services — H RES 511 QUESTION: ON AGREEING TO THE RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 3916, TO AMEND THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986 TO REPEAL THE EXCISE TAX ON TELEPHONE AND OTHER COMMUNICATION SERVICESH.Res. 511 · 106th Congress · On Agreeing to the ResolutionYeaDirection not readable
2000-05-25Providing for the Consideration of H.R. 3916, to Amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to Repeal the Excise Tax on Telephone and Other Communication Services — H RES 511 QUESTION: ON ORDERING THE PREVIOUS QUESTION PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 3916, TO AMEND THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986 TO REPEAL THE EXCISE TAX ON TELEPHONE AND OTHER COMMUNICATION SERVICESH.Res. 511 · 106th Congress · On Ordering the Previous QuestionNayDirection not readable
2000-04-13Date Certain Tax Code Replacement Act — H R 4199 QUESTION: ON PASSAGE DATE CERTAIN TAX CODE REPLACEMENT ACTH.R. 4199 · 106th Congress · On PassageNayRaise revenue
2000-04-13Date Certain Tax Code Replacement Act — H R 4199 QUESTION: ON MOTION TO RECOMMIT WITH INSTRUCTIONS DATE CERTAIN TAX CODE REPLACEMENT ACTH.R. 4199 · 106th Congress · On Motion to Recommit with InstructionsYeaDirection not readable
2000-04-12Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with respect to tax limitations — H J RES 94 QUESTION: ON PASSAGE PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES WITH RESPECT TO TAX LIMITATIONSH.J.Res. 94 · 106th Congress · On PassageNayRaise revenue
2000-04-11Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2000 — H R 4163 QUESTION: ON MOTION TO SUSPEND THE RULES AND PASS, AS AMENDED TAXPAYER BILL OF RIGHTS 2000H.R. 4163 · 106th Congress · On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedYeaCut taxes
2000-03-09Wage and Employment Growth Act — H R 3081 QUESTION: ON PASSAGE WAGE AND EMPLOYMENT GROWTH ACTH.R. 3081 · 106th Congress · On PassageNayRaise revenue
2000-03-09Wage and Employment Growth Act — H R 3081 QUESTION: ON MOTION TO RECOMMIT WITH INSTRUCTIONS WAGE AND EMPLOYMENT GROWTH ACTH.R. 3081 · 106th Congress · On Motion to Recommit with InstructionsYeaDirection not readable
2000-02-10Marriage Tax Penalty Relief Act of 2000 — H R 6 QUESTION: ON PASSAGE MARRIAGE TAX PENALTY RELIEF ACT OF 2000H.R. 6 · 106th Congress · On PassageNayRaise revenue
2000-02-10Marriage Tax Penalty Relief Act of 2000 — H R 6 QUESTION: ON MOTION TO RECOMMIT WITH INSTRUCTIONS MARRIAGE TAX PENALTY RELIEF ACT OF 2000H.R. 6 · 106th Congress · On Motion to Recommit with InstructionsYeaDirection not readable
2000-02-10H R 6 AUTHOR(S): RANGEL OF NEW YORK SUBSTITUTE AMENDMENT QUESTION: ON AGREEING TO THE AMENDMENT MARRIAGE TAX PENALTY RELIEF ACT OF 2000H.R. 6 · 106th Congress · On Agreeing to the AmendmentYeaCut taxes
1999-10-26Expressing the sense of Congress that there should be no increase in Federal taxes in order to fund additional Government spending. — H CON RES 208 QUESTION: ON MOTION TO SUSPEND THE RULES AND AGREE EXPRESSING THE SENSE OF CONGRESS THAT THERE SHOULD BE NO INCREASE IN FEDERAL TAXES IN ORDER TO FUND ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT SPENDING.H.Con.Res. 208 · 106th Congress · On Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeYeaDirection not readable
1999-10-19Financial Freedom Act of 1999 — H R 2488 QUESTION: TABLE MOTION TO DISCHARGE COMMITTEE FINANCIAL FREEDOM ACT OF 1999H.R. 2488 · 106th Congress · Table Motion to Discharge CommitteeNayDirection not readable
1999-08-05Financial Freedom Act of 1999 — H R 2488 QUESTION: ON AGREEING TO THE CONFERENCE REPORT FINANCIAL FREEDOM ACT OF 1999H.R. 2488 · 106th Congress · On Agreeing to the Conference ReportNayRaise revenue
1999-08-05Financial Freedom Act of 1999 — H R 2488 QUESTION: ON MOTION TO RECOMMIT WITH INSTRUCTIONS FINANCIAL FREEDOM ACT OF 1999H.R. 2488 · 106th Congress · On Motion to Recommit with InstructionsYeaDirection not readable
1999-08-02Financial Freedom Act of 1999 — H R 2488 QUESTION: ON MOTION TO INSTRUCT CONFEREES FINANCIAL FREEDOM ACT OF 1999H.R. 2488 · 106th Congress · On Motion to Instruct ConfereesYeaDirection not readable
1999-07-22Financial Freedom Act of 1999 — H R 2488 QUESTION: ON PASSAGE FINANCIAL FREEDOM ACT OF 1999H.R. 2488 · 106th Congress · On PassageNayRaise revenue
1999-07-22Financial Freedom Act of 1999 — H R 2488 QUESTION: ON MOTION TO RECOMMIT WITH INSTRUCTIONS FINANCIAL FREEDOM ACT OF 1999H.R. 2488 · 106th Congress · On Motion to Recommit with InstructionsYeaDirection not readable
1999-07-22H R 2488 AUTHOR(S): RANGEL OF NEW YORK SUBSTITUTE AMENDMENT QUESTION: ON AGREEING TO THE AMENDMENT FINANCIAL FREEDOM ACT OF 1999H.R. 2488 · 106th Congress · On Agreeing to the AmendmentYeaDirection not readable
1999-04-15Availability of Certain Tax Benefits For Services As Part of Operation Allied Force — H R 1376 QUESTION: ON PASSAGE AVAILABILITY OF CERTAIN TAX BENEFITS FOR SERVICES AS PART OF OPERATION ALLIED FORCEH.R. 1376 · 106th Congress · On PassageYeaCut taxes
1999-04-15Proposing an Amendment to the Constitution of the United States With Respect to Tax Limitations — H J RES 37 QUESTION: ON PASSAGE PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES WITH RESPECT TO TAX LIMITATIONSH.J.Res. 37 · 106th Congress · On PassageNayRaise revenue

Sorted newest first. “Counted as” is which end of the Raise revenue / Cut taxes axis the vote moved this member toward, using the direction recorded for this issue on that roll call. Open any row to see the full measure, the tally, and the reason that direction was assigned.