Skip to content
Their Record
J. James Exon

J. James Exon on Financial Regulation

DemocratNE

Financial Regulation56 votes · 78.1/100 consistent
RegulateDeregulate

111 roll calls on this member’s record are tagged Financial Regulation. 56 of them counted toward the score above: 32 toward “Regulate” and 24 toward “Deregulate”.

The other 55 did not count: 54 were roll calls whose direction on this issue could not be read confidently — mostly procedural motions — and 1 was one they did not cast a yea or nay on. They are listed below anyway, marked as not scored, because a filtered list of votes is not a voting record.

DateWhat was voted onVotedCounted as
1982-06-18TO AMEND H.R. 3112 TO MAKE THE NEW BAILOUT STANDARD EFFECTIVE ON AUGUST 6, 1982; TO STRIKE THE PROVISION REGARDING NO FINAL JUDGMENT OF VOTING DISCRIMINATION HAVING BEEN HANDED DOWN BY ANY U.S. COURT FOR A PERIOD OF 10 YEARS; TO PROVIDE THAT NO FINAL JUDGMENT OF ANY U.S. COURT HAD BEEN ENTERED THAT DENIALS OR ABRIDGEMENTS OF RIGHT TO VOTE BECAUSE OF RACE, COLOR, OR MEMBERSHIP IN LANGUAGE MINORITY HAVE BEEN PERPETRATED BY STATE OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION (OR WITHIN STATE OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION WITH ITS KNOWLEDGE OR ACQUIESCENCE); THAT NO FEDERAL EXAMINERS FOR PURPOSE OF REGISTERING VOTERS COULD HAVE BEEN SENT INTO STATE OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION FOR 10 YEARS; THAT NO SUBSTANTIAL VOTING LAW CHANGES TO PRECLEARANCE HAD BEEN IMPLEMENTED AGAINST THE LAW; THAT NO SUBSTANTIAL OBJECTIONS HAD BEEN INTERPOSED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL; THAT STATE OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION HAD ONLY ENGAGED IN CONSTRUCTIVE EFFORTS; THAT SECOND-PARTY INTERVENTION IN SUCH ACTIONS SHALL BE GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE; AND THAT DECLARATORY JUDGMENT FOR BAILOUT COULD BE REOPENED FOR A PERIOD OF 5 YEARS (RATHER THAN 10 YEARS) UPON MOTION ONLY OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IF HE ALLEGES CONDUCT HAS OCCURED WHICH, HAD IT OCCURED DURING 10 YEARS PRECEDING BAILOUT, THE DECLARATORY JUDGEMENT WOULD HAVE BEEN PRECLUDED. SEE NOTE(S) 33H.R. 3112 · 97th CongressDid not voteDirection not readable
1982-06-17TO AMEND S. 1992 TO CHANGE THE BAILOUT PROVISION IN THE BILL SO AS TO PERMIT A STATE TO BAIL OUT EVEN IF SOME OF ITS COUNTIES HAVE NOT QUALIFIED FOR A BAILOUT UNDER THE LISTED CRITERIA. (MOTION FAILED) SEE NOTE(S) 33S. 1992 · 97th CongressDid not voteDirection not readable
1982-06-17TO AMEND S. 1992, THUS EASING THE "BAILOUT" PROVISIONS. (MOTION FAILED) SEE NOTE(S) 33S. 1992 · 97th CongressDid not voteDirection not readable
1982-06-17TO AMEND S. 1992 BY EASING PROVISIONS RELATING TO "BAILOUT" OF COVERED JURISDICTIONS. (MOTION FAILED) SEE NOTE(S) 33S. 1992 · 97th CongressDid not voteDirection not readable
1981-05-13TO AGREE TO S.RES. 132, CONCERNING THE MONETARY POLICIES OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD. (MOTION FAILED)S.Res. 132 · 97th CongressYeaDirection not readable
1981-03-12TO AMEND S. 414, PERMITTING MERCHANTS TO ALLOW UNLIMITED DISCOUNTS TO CASH PAYING CUSTOMERS BY PERMITTING SURCHARGES ON CREDIT CARD CUSTOMERS. (MOTION FAILED)S. 414 · 97th CongressYeaDeregulate
1979-11-01(CONTINUED) TO PASS H.R. 4986, DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS DEREGULATION.H.R. 4986 · 96th CongressYeaDeregulate
1979-11-01TO AMEND H.R. 4986, DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS DEREGULATION, BY REMOVING TITLE II OF THE BILL AUTHORIZING THE FEDERAL RESERVE TO REQUIRE RESERVES OF NONMEMBER DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS. (MOTION PASSED)H.R. 4986 · 96th CongressYeaDeregulate
1979-11-01TO AMEND H.R. 4986, DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS DEREGULATION, BY PERMITTING STATES TO DETERMINE WHETHER TO PERMIT NOW ACCOUNTS. (MOTION FAILED)H.R. 4986 · 96th CongressYeaDirection not readable
1979-10-31TO TABLE MORGAN SUBSTITUTE TO H.R. 4986, DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS DEREGULATION. THE MORGAN AMENDMENT OMITS THE PHASE-OUT OF REGULATION AND NATIONWIDE NOW ACCOUNTS, THE PROVISION LOWERING MONEY MARKET CERTIFICATES FROM $10,000, TO $1,000, AND FEDERAL RESERVE AUTHORITY OVER NONMEMBER INSTITUTIONS. (MOTION PASSED)H.R. 4986 · 96th CongressNayRegulate
1979-10-29TO AMEND H.R. 4986, DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS DEREGULATIONS, BY AUTHORIZING ON A TEMPORARY BASIS CERTAIN BUSINESS AND AGRICULTURAL LOANS, NOTWITHSTANDING INTEREST LIMITATIONS IN STATE CONSTITUTIONS OR STATUTES. (MOTION PASSED)H.R. 4986 · 96th CongressNayRegulate

Sorted newest first. “Counted as” is which end of the Regulate / Deregulate axis the vote moved this member toward, using the direction recorded for this issue on that roll call. Open any row to see the full measure, the tally, and the reason that direction was assigned.