Maurice D. Hinchey on Abortion & Contraception

DemocratNY

Abortion & Contraception72 votes · 83.1/100 consistent

Expand accessRestrict access

109 roll calls on this member’s record are tagged Abortion & Contraception. 72 of them counted toward the score above: 63 toward “Expand access” and 9 toward “Restrict access”.

The other 37 did not count: 37 were roll calls whose direction on this issue could not be read confidently — mostly procedural motions — and 0 were ones they did not cast a yea or nay on. They are listed below anyway, marked as not scored, because a filtered list of votes is not a voting record.

Date	What was voted on	Voted	Counted as
1993-03-24	FAMILY PLANNING AMENDMENTS ACT OF 1993 — (HOUSE AGREED TO THE WAXMAN MOTION THAT THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE RISE.)H.R. 670 · 103rd Congress · ON MOTION TO RISE	Yea	Direction not readable
1993-03-24	(HOUSE AGREED TO THE DELAY AMENDMENT, AS AMENDED, THAT REQUIRES THAT PERSONS WHO COUNSEL PATIENTS AT FEDERALLY FUNDED FAMILY PLANNING CLINICS ON PREGNANCY MANAGEMENT OPTIONS MUST HAVE A PROFESSIONAL DEGREE IN MEDICINE, NURSING, CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, AN ALLIED HEALTH PROFESSION, SOCIAL WORK OR PERSONS WHO MEET CRITERIA ESTABLISHED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OR PERSONS WHO ARE ALLOWED TO PROVIDE SUCH COUNSELING UNDER STATE LAW.)H.R. 670 · 103rd Congress · On Agreeing to the Amendment	Yea	Restrict access
1993-03-24	H.R.670 BY WAXMAN (D-CA) -- FAMILY PLANNING AMENDMENTS ACT OF 1993 (HOUSE AGREED TO THE WAXMAN AMENDMENT TO THE DELAY AMENDMENT THAT PROVIDES THAT PERSONS WHO COUNSEL PATIENTS AT FEDERALLY FUNDED FAMILY PLANNING CLINICS MAY BE PERSONS WHO MEET CRITERIA ESTABLISHED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES OR PERSONS WHO ARE ALLOWED TO PROVIDE SUCH COUNSELING UNDER STATE LAW.)H.R. 670 · 103rd Congress · On Agreeing to the Amendment	Yea	Expand access
1993-03-24	PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 670; FAMILY PLANNING AMENDMENTS ACT OF 1993 — (HOUSE AGREED TO THE MOAKLEY MOTION TO TABLE THE SLAUGHTER MOTION TO RECONSIDER THE VOTE.)H.Res. 138 · 103rd Congress · TABLE MOTION TO RECONSIDER	Yea	Direction not readable
1993-03-24	PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 670; FAMILY PLANNING AMENDMENTS ACT OF 1993 — (HOUSE PASSED H.RES. 138, THE RULE UNDER WHICH H.R. 670 WAS CONSIDERED.)H.Res. 138 · 103rd Congress · On Agreeing to the Resolution	Yea	Direction not readable
1993-03-24	PROVIDING FOR THE CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 670; FAMILY PLANNING AMENDMENTS ACT OF 1993 — H.RES.138 BY SLAUGHTER, LOUISE (D-NY) -- PROCEDURAL RESOLUTION - H.R. 670 (HOUSE AGREED TO ORDER THE PREVIOUS QUESTION ON THE RULE.)H.Res. 138 · 103rd Congress · On Ordering the Previous Question	Yea	Direction not readable
1993-03-11	H.R.4 BY WAXMAN (D-CA) -- NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH REVITALIZATION ACT OF 1993 (HOUSE AGREED TO THE BLILEY AMENDMENT, AS AMENDED, THAT RESTORES THE FETAL TISSUE RESEARCH CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND ADDS AN ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT THAT ATTENDING PHYSICIANS CERTIFY THAT ABORTIONS IN WHICH FETAL TISSUE IS DONATED FOR TRANSPLANT RESEARCH WERE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATE LAW.)H.R. 4 · 103rd Congress · On Agreeing to the Amendment	Yea	Restrict access
1993-03-10	(HOUSE AGREED TO THE BLILEY AMENDMENT, AS AMENDED BY THE WAXMAN SUBSTITUTE THAT RESTORES THE FETAL TISSUE RESEARCH CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND ADDS AN ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT THAT ATTENDING PHYSICIANS CERTIFY THAT ABORTIONS IN WHICH FETAL TISSUE IS DONATED FOR TRANSPLANT RESEARCH WERE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATE LAW.)H.R. 4 · 103rd Congress · On Agreeing to the Amendment	Yea	Restrict access
1993-03-10	H.R.4 BY WAXMAN (D-CA) -- NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH REVITALIZATION ACT OF 1993 (HOUSE AGREED TO THE WAXMAN SUBSTITUTE TO THE BLILEY AMENDMENT THAT RESTORES THE FETAL TISSUE RESEARCH CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AND ADDS AN ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT THAT ATTENDING PHYSICIANS CERTIFY THAT ABORTIONS IN WHICH FETAL TISSUE IS DONATED FOR TRANSPLANT RESEARCH WERE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATE LAW.)H.R. 4 · 103rd Congress · On Agreeing to the Amendment	Yea	Direction not readable

Sorted newest first. “Counted as” is which end of the Expand access / Restrict access axis the vote moved this member toward, using the direction recorded for this issue on that roll call. Open any row to see the full measure, the tally, and the reason that direction was assigned.