Skip to content
Their Record

Senate Roll Call 176, 103rd Congress · June 24, 1993

To create a legislative item veto by requiring separate enrollment of items in appropriations bills and tax expenditure provisions in revenue bills. — (THREE-FIFTHS OF THOSE SENATORS DULY CHOSEN AND SWORN NOT HAVING VOTED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE, SENATE REJECTED A MOTION TO WAIVE THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET ACT OF 1974 WITH RESPECT TO CONSIDERATION OF BRADLEY AMENDMENT NO. 542, TO CREATE A LEGISLATIVE ITEM VETO BY REQUIRING SEPARATE ENROLLMENT OF ITEMS IN APPROPRIATIONS BILLS AND TAX EXPENDITURE PROVISIONS IN REVENUE BILLS.)

Question before the chamber: On the Motion

53 yea · 45 nayMotion Rejected2 not voting or present
Democrat14 yea · 38 nay
Republican38 yea · 6 nay
Independent1 yea · 1 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

S. 1134 ↗

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993

Policy area: Economics and Public Finance — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

  • Spending & BudgetA yea counts toward “Fiscal restraint”

    model(0.85): Creating an item veto mechanism aims to curb spending and tax expenditures.

    Tagged by: policy-area:Economics and Public Finance

    Axis: Fiscal expansion ← → Fiscal restraint

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (53)

Nay (45)

Not voting or present (2)

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.