Skip to content
Their Record

Senate Roll Call 512, 103rd Congress · May 18, 1994

To require risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis regarding major human health or environmental regulations promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency. — (SENATE AGREED TO JOHNSTON AMENDMENT NO. 1720, TO REQUIRE RISK ASSESSMENT AND COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS REGARDING MAJOR HUMAN HEALTH OR ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS PROMULGATED BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.)

Question before the chamber: On the Amendment

90 yea · 8 nayAmendment Agreed to2 not voting or present
Democrat48 yea · 5 nay
Republican41 yea · 2 nay
Independent1 yea · 1 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

S. 2019 ↗

Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1994

Policy area: Environmental Protection — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

  • Climate & EnergyA yea counts toward “Fossil fuel priority”

    model(0.90): Requiring cost-benefit analyses creates regulatory hurdles for EPA environmental protections.

    Tagged by: policy-area:Environmental Protection

    Axis: Climate action ← → Fossil fuel priority

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (90)

Nay (8)

Not voting or present (2)

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.