Senate Roll Call 703, 103rd Congress · September 27, 1994

To require that the joint explanatory statement of the conference committee on an appropriations bill specify whether earmarked expenditures in the conference report or joint explanatory statement were contained in the House bill or committee report, the Senate bill or committee report, or added by the conferees. — (SENATE REJECTED SMITH AMENDMENT NO. 2588 TO HOUSE AMENDMENT IN DISAGREEMENT TO SENATE AMENDMENT NUMBER 28, TO REQUIRE THAT THE JOINT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT OF THE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON AN APPROPRIATIONS BILL SPECIFY WHETHER EARMARKED EXPENDITURES IN THE CONFERENCE REPORT OR JOINT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT WERE CONTAINED IN THE HOUSE BILL OR COMMITTEE REPORT, THE SENATE BILL OR COMMITTEE REPORT, OR ADDED BY THE CONFEREES.)

Question before the chamber: On the Amendment

45 yea · 55 nayAmendment Rejected

Democrat10 yea · 44 nay

Republican34 yea · 10 nay

Independent1 yea · 1 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

H.R. 4624 ↗

Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, andIndependent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1995

Policy area: Economics and Public Finance — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

Spending & BudgetDirection unreadable — not scored
excluded:model-unclear (0.85) Procedural disclosure rule requiring conference reports to identify earmarked expenditures.
Tagged by: policy-area:Economics and Public Finance
Axis: Fiscal expansion ← → Fiscal restraint

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (45)

Nay (55)

Not voting or present (0)

None

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.