Skip to content
Their Record

Senate Roll Call 708, 103rd Congress · September 29, 1994

To improve the operations of the legislative branch of the Federal Government. — H.R.4649 BY DIXON, JULIAN (D-CA) -- DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 1995 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS AND RESCISSIONS ACT, 1994 (PUB. L. 103-334, APPROVED 9/30/94) (THREE-FIFTHS OF THOSE SENATORS DULY CHOSEN AND SWORN NOT HAVING VOTED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE, SENATE REJECTED A MOTION TO WAIVE THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET ACT OF 1974 WITH RESPECT TO CONSIDERATION OF DOMENICI AMENDMENT NO. 2596 TO HOUSE AMENDMENT IN DISAGREEMENT TO SENATE AMENDMENT NUMBER 12, TO IMPROVE THE OPERATIONS OF THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.)

Question before the chamber: On the Motion

58 yea · 41 nayMotion Rejected1 not voting or present
Democrat21 yea · 32 nay
Republican35 yea · 9 nay
Independent2 yea · 0 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

H.R. 4649 ↗

Making appropriations for the government of the District of Columbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in part against the revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1995, and for other purposes.

Policy area: Economics and Public Finance — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

  • Spending & BudgetDirection unreadable — not scored

    excluded:model-unclear (0.85) Motion to waive the Budget Act is procedural and the amendment text is truncated.

    Tagged by: policy-area:Economics and Public Finance

    Axis: Fiscal expansion ← → Fiscal restraint

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (58)

Nay (41)

Not voting or present (1)

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.