Skip to content
Their Record

Senate Roll Call 127, 104th Congress · April 6, 1995

In the nature of a substitute. — H.R.1158 BY LIVINGSTON (R-LA) -- SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS AND RESCISSIONS ACT, 1995 (VETOED 6/7/95) (THREE-FIFTHS OF THOSE SENATORS DULY CHOSEN AND SWORN NOT HAVING VOTED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE, SENATE FAILED TO CLOSE FURTHER DEBATE ON HATFIELD AMENDMENT NO. 420, IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE.)

Question before the chamber: On the Cloture Motion

56 yea · 44 nayCloture Motion Rejected
Democrat3 yea · 43 nay
Republican52 yea · 0 nay
Independent1 yea · 1 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

H.R. 1158 ↗

Second Supplemental Appropriations and Rescissions Act, 1995

Policy area: Economics and Public Finance — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

  • Spending & BudgetDirection unreadable — not scored

    excluded:model-unclear (0.90) The text describes a substitute amendment without specifying its net spending impact.

    Tagged by: policy-area:Economics and Public Finance

    Axis: Fiscal expansion ← → Fiscal restraint

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (56)

Nay (44)

Not voting or present (0)

None

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.