Skip to content
Their Record

Senate Roll Call 176, 104th Congress · May 23, 1995

To lessen tax increases on working families by using amounts set aside for a tax cut. — (THREE-FIFTHS OF THOSE SENATORS DULY CHOSEN AND SWORN NOT HAVING VOTED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE, SENATE REJECTED A MOTION TO WAIVE SECTION 305 OF THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET ACT OF 1974, WITH RESPECT TO CONSIDERATION OF BRADLEY AMENDMENT NO. 1122, TO LESSEN TAX INCREASES ON WORKING FAMILIES BY USING AMOUNTS SET ASIDE FOR A TAX CUT.)

Question before the chamber: On the Motion

47 yea · 53 nayMotion Rejected
Democrat45 yea · 1 nay
Republican0 yea · 52 nay
Independent2 yea · 0 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

S.Con.Res. 13

An original concurrent resolution setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for the fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002.

Policy area: Economics and Public Finance — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

  • TaxesA yea counts toward “Cut taxes”

    model(0.85): A yes advances a measure to reduce tax increases on working families, lowering tax burdens.

    Tagged by: keyword:tax cut

    Axis: Raise revenue ← → Cut taxes

  • Spending & BudgetDirection unreadable — not scored

    excluded:model-unclear (0.85) The measure reallocates tax relief rather than expanding or restraining overall federal spending.

    Tagged by: policy-area:Economics and Public Finance

    Axis: Fiscal expansion ← → Fiscal restraint

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (47)

Nay (53)

Not voting or present (0)

None

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.