Skip to content
Their Record

Senate Roll Call 313, 104th Congress · July 20, 1995

Expressing the sense of the Senate that the 104th Congress should consider comprehensive campaign finance reform legislation. — (SENATE REJECTED A MOTION TO TABLE THE FEINGOLD AMENDMENT NO. 1803, TO EXPRESS THE SENSE OF THE SENATE THAT THE 104TH CONGRESS SHOULD CONSIDER COMPREHENSIVE CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM LEGISLATION.)

Question before the chamber: On the Motion to Table

41 yea · 57 nayMotion to Table Failed2 not voting or present
Democrat0 yea · 44 nay
Republican41 yea · 11 nay
Independent0 yea · 2 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

H.R. 1854 ↗

Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1996

Policy area: Economics and Public Finance — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

  • Voting & ElectionsDirection unreadable — not scored

    excluded:model-unclear (0.95) A non-binding sense of the Senate resolution does not directly change voter access laws.

    Tagged by: keyword:campaign finance

    Axis: Expand access ← → Restrict access

  • Spending & BudgetDirection unreadable — not scored

    excluded:model-unclear (0.95) A non-binding sense of the Senate resolution on campaign finance is not a spending issue.

    Tagged by: policy-area:Economics and Public Finance

    Axis: Fiscal expansion ← → Fiscal restraint

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (41)

Nay (57)

Not voting or present (2)

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.