Skip to content
Their Record

Senate Roll Call 848, 104th Congress · July 24, 1996

To prohibit the use of funds to carry out a peanut program that is operated by a marketing association if the Secretary of Agriculture determines that a member of the Board of Directors of the association has a conflict of interest with respect to the program. — (SENATE REJECTED SANTORUM AMENDMENT NO. 4967, TO PROHIBIT THE USE OF FUNDS TO CARRY OUT A PEANUT PROGRAM THAT IS OPERATED BY A MARKETING ASSOCIATION IF THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE DETERMINES THAT A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ASSOCIATION HAS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST WITH RESPECT TO THE PROGRAM.)

Question before the chamber: On the Motion to Table

61 yea · 37 nayMotion to Table Agreed to2 not voting or present
Democrat32 yea · 15 nay
Republican28 yea · 21 nay
Independent1 yea · 1 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

H.R. 3603 ↗

Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1997

Policy area: Economics and Public Finance — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

  • Spending & BudgetA yea counts toward “Fiscal expansion”

    model(0.90): Tabling a spending prohibition on peanut marketing associations kills the restriction, expanding spending.

    Tagged by: policy-area:Economics and Public Finance

    Axis: Fiscal expansion ← → Fiscal restraint

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (61)

Nay (37)

Not voting or present (2)

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.