Frank A. LoBiondo on Labor & Wages

RepublicanNJ

Labor & Wages122 votes · 65.4/100 consistent

Worker priorityEmployer priority

210 roll calls on this member’s record are tagged Labor & Wages. 122 of them counted toward the score above: 71 toward “Worker priority” and 51 toward “Employer priority”.

The other 88 did not count: 87 were roll calls whose direction on this issue could not be read confidently — mostly procedural motions — and 1 was one they did not cast a yea or nay on. They are listed below anyway, marked as not scored, because a filtered list of votes is not a voting record.

Date	What was voted on	Voted	Counted as
1995-09-12	(HOUSE REJECTED THE ANDREWS AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE THAT SOUGHT TO EXPRESS THE SENSE OF CONGRESS THAT THE LABOR DEPARTMENT SHOULD APPLY THE SAME FIDUCIARY STANDARDS TO ECONOMICALLY TARGETED INVESTMENTS AS ARE APPLICABLE TO PENSION PLAN INVESTMENTS GENERALLY UNDER ERISA AND ELIMINATE THE ETI CLEARINGHOUSE.)H.R. 1594 · 104th Congress · On Agreeing to the Amendment	Nay	Worker priority
1995-09-12	(HOUSE REJECTED THE HINCHEY AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT NOTHING IN THE BILL COULD BE CONSTRUED AS PROHIBITING THE INVESTMENT BY AN EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN IN DOMESTIC INVESTMENTS, AS DISTINGUISHED FROM FOREIGN INVESTMENTS, AND DIRECT THE SECRETARY TO TAKE SUCH ACTIONS AS NECESSARY TO ENCOURAGE DOMESTIC INVESTMENTS BY PENSION PLANS TO THE EXTENT THAT SUCH INVESTMENTS ARE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ERISA.)H.R. 1594 · 104th Congress · On Agreeing to the Amendment	Nay	Employer priority
1995-09-12	H.R.1594 BY SAXTON (R-NJ) -- PENSION PROTECTION ACT OF 1995 (HOUSE REJECTED THE GENE GREEN OF TEXAS AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO CLARIFY THAT NOTHING IN THE BILL COULD BE CONSTRUED AS PROHIBITING PRIVATE PENSION PLANS FROM INVESTING IN DOMESTIC INVESTMENTS, AS DISTINGUISHED FROM FOREIGN INVESTMENTS.)H.R. 1594 · 104th Congress · On Agreeing to the Amendment	Nay	Employer priority
1995-08-04	Labor, HHS and Education Appropriations for Fiscal Year 1996 — (HOUSE REJECTED THE OBEY MOTION TO RECOMMIT THE BILL TO THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO REPORT IT BACK FORTHWITH CONTAINING AMENDMENTS THAT SOUGHT TO STRIKE LANGUAGE RELATING TO STRIKER REPLACEMENTS; STRIKE LANGUAGE THAT PROHIBITS OSHA FROM PROMULGATING OR ISSUING ANY GUIDELINES REGARDING ERGONOMIC PROTECTION OR REPORTING RELATED OCCUPATIONAL INJURIES AND ILLNESSES; AND STRIKE LANGUAGE RELATING TO THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD SALARIES AND EXPENSES.)H.R. 2127 · 104th Congress · On Motion to Recommit with Instructions	Nay	Employer priority
1995-08-02	(HOUSE REJECTED THE PELOSI AMENDMENTS EN BLOC THAT SOUGHT TO STRIKE LANGUAGE PROHIBITING THE USE OF FUNDS BY OSHA TO DEVELOP, PROMULGATE, OR ISSUE ANY STANDARDS OR GUIDELINES ON ERGONOMIC PROTECTION; LANGUAGE PROHIBITING THE USE OF FUNDS BY THE NLRB TO INVESTIGATE OR PROSECUTE ANY ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE AGAINST AN EMPLOYER, WHEN SUCH CHARGES ARE BASED IN WHOLE OR IN PART ON AN EMPLOYER TAKING ANY ADVERSE ACTION AGAINST ANY INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE EMPLOYEES OF AGENTS OF ANY LABOR UNION; AND LANGUAGE PROHIBITING THE USE OF FUNDS BY THE NLRB TO EXERCISE ITS AUTHORITY TO GO TO COURT TO SEEK AN INJUNCTION UNLESS CERTAIN CONDITIONS ARE MET.)H.R. 2127 · 104th Congress · On agreeing to the Amendments en bloc	Nay	Employer priority
1995-07-25	(HOUSE AGREED TO THE COLEMAN AMENDMENT THAT STRIKES LANGUAGE REPEALING SECTION 13(C) OF THE FEDERAL TRANSIT ACT, WHICH GUARANTEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AND OTHER LABOR PROTECTIONS FOR TRANSIT EMPLOYEES.)H.R. 2002 · 104th Congress · On Agreeing to the Amendment	Yea	Worker priority
1995-03-24	(HOUSE REJECTED THE MINK AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE THAT SOUGHT TO TRANSFORM THE AID TO FAMILIES WITH DEPENDENT CHILDREN (AFDC) PROGRAM INTO A PROGRAM THAT MOVES RECIPIENTS FROM WELFARE TO WORK BY PROVIDING A PUBLIC SECTOR OR SUBSIDIZED PRIVATE SECTOR JOB PAYING MINIMUM WAGE FOR AT LEAST TWO YEARS; INCREASE FUNDING IN THE JOBS PROGRAM PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS BY FIVE PERCENT PER YEAR OVER SEVEN YEARS, RISING FROM 15 PERCENT IN FISCAL YEAR 1997 TO 50 PERCENT IN FISCAL YEAR 2003, RESULTING IN A $14.9 BILLION AUTHORIZATION IN ADDITIONAL JOBS FUNDING OVER THE FIVE YEARS; TAKE STEPS TO EXPAND CHILD CARE SERVICES FOR POOR FAMILIES; AND FINANCE THE SPENDING INCREASES BY RAISING THE TOP CORPORATE INCOME TAX RATE BY 1.25 PERCENT TO 36.25 PERCENT.)H.R. 4 · 104th Congress · On agreeing to the Substitute Amendment	Nay	Employer priority
1995-03-15	(HOUSE AGREED TO THE DELAY AMENDMENT THAT INCREASES THE AMOUNT RESCINDED FROM THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (OSHA) SALARIES AND EXPENSES BY $3.5 MILLION.)H.R. 1158 · 104th Congress · On Agreeing to the Amendment	Yea	Employer priority
1995-01-30	(HOUSE REJECTED THE PELOSI AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE THAT THE PROVISIONS NOT APPLY TO LAWS OR REGULATIONS THAT ESTABLISH A MINIMUM WAGE.)H.R. 5 · 104th Congress · On Agreeing to the Amendment	Nay	Employer priority
1995-01-23	(HOUSE REJECTED THE SANDERS EN BLOC AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO EXEMPT FROM PROVISIONS ANY FEDERAL MANDATE THAT ESTABLISHES MINIMUM LABOR PROTECTION STANDARDS SUCH AS CHILD LABOR LAWS AND THE MINIMUM WAGE.)H.R. 5 · 104th Congress · On agreeing to the amendments en bloc	Nay	Employer priority

Sorted newest first. “Counted as” is which end of the Worker priority / Employer priority axis the vote moved this member toward, using the direction recorded for this issue on that roll call. Open any row to see the full measure, the tally, and the reason that direction was assigned.