Skip to content
Their Record

House Roll Call 637, 104th Congress · September 12, 1995

(HOUSE REJECTED THE ANDREWS AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE THAT SOUGHT TO EXPRESS THE SENSE OF CONGRESS THAT THE LABOR DEPARTMENT SHOULD APPLY THE SAME FIDUCIARY STANDARDS TO ECONOMICALLY TARGETED INVESTMENTS AS ARE APPLICABLE TO PENSION PLAN INVESTMENTS GENERALLY UNDER ERISA AND ELIMINATE THE ETI CLEARINGHOUSE.)

Question before the chamber: On Agreeing to the Amendment

178 yea · 232 nayFailed24 not voting or present
Democrat173 yea · 9 nay
Republican4 yea · 223 nay
Independent1 yea · 0 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

H.R. 1594 ↗

To place restrictions on the promotion by the Department of Labor and other Federal agencies and instrumentalities of economically targeted investments in connection with employee benefit plans.

Policy area: Labor and Employment — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

  • Labor & WagesA yea counts toward “Employer priority”

    model(0.80): A yes vote eliminates the ETI clearinghouse, favoring strict employer fiduciary standards.

    Tagged by: policy-area:Labor and Employment

    Axis: Worker priority ← → Employer priority

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (178)

Nay (232)

Not voting or present (24)

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.