Skip to content
Their Record

House Roll Call 140, 103rd Congress · April 29, 1993

H.R.1578 BY SPRATT (D-SC) -- EXPEDITED RESCISSIONS ACT OF 1993 (HOUSE AGREED TO THE MICHEL AMENDMENT TO THE CASTLE AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE THAT SOUGHT TO PROVIDE FOR THE AUTOMATIC ADOPTION OF THE PRESIDENT'S RESCISSION PACKAGE UNLESS BOTH THE HOUSE AND THE SENATE DISAPPROVE THE PROPOSAL; TO PROVIDE THAT THE PRESIDENT WOULD HAVE 20 CALENDAR DAYS TO SEND TO THE CONGRESS HIS RESCISSION PACKAGE, AND THAT THE CONGRESS WOULD THEN HAVE 20 LEGISLATIVE DAYS TO ADOPT A JOINT RESOLUTION REJECTING THE PROPOSAL; AND TO GIVE THE PRESIDENT ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO REPEAL TARGETED TAX BENEFITS IN REVENUE MEASURES.)

Question before the chamber: On Agreeing to the Amendment

257 yea · 154 nayAgreed to22 not voting or present
Democrat82 yea · 154 nay
Republican175 yea · 2 nay
Independent0 yea · 1 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

H.R. 1578 ↗

Expedited Rescissions Act of 1993

Policy area: Economics and Public Finance — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

  • Spending & BudgetA yea counts toward “Fiscal restraint”

    model(0.90): Strengthening rescission procedures facilitates spending cuts and fiscal restraint.

    Tagged by: policy-area:Economics and Public Finance

    Axis: Fiscal expansion ← → Fiscal restraint

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (257)

Nay (157)

Not voting or present (22)

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.