Skip to content
Their Record

House Roll Call 752, 103rd Congress · May 5, 1994

FREEDOM OF ACCESS TO CLINICS ACT — S.636 BY KENNEDY, EDWARD (D-MA) -- FREEDOM OF ACCESS TO CLINIC ENTRANCES ACT OF 1994 (PUB. L. 103-259, APPROVED 5/26/94) (HOUSE REJECTED THE SENSENBRENNER MOTION TO RECOMMIT THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO THE COMMITTEE OF CONFERENCE WITH INSTRUCTIONS THAT THE MANAGERS ON THE PART OF THE HOUSE ADOPT THE HOUSE LANGUAGE ON ATTORNEYS FEES WHICH PROVIDES THAT THE COURT MAY AWARD TO THE PREVAILING PARTY, WHETHER PLAINTIFF OR DEFENDANT, OTHER THAN THE UNITED STATES, REASONABLE FEES FOR ATTORNEYS AND EXPERT WITNESSES.)

Question before the chamber: RECOMMIT CONFERENCE REPORT WITH INSTRUCTIONS

193 yea · 222 nayFailed17 not voting or present
Democrat37 yea · 200 nay
Republican156 yea · 21 nay
Independent0 yea · 1 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

S. 636 ↗

Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act of 1994

Policy area: Health — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

  • Health CareDirection unreadable — not scored

    excluded:model-unclear (0.85) Instructions regarding attorney fee awards in clinic access cases do not directly alter health care coverage.

    Tagged by: policy-area:Health

    Axis: Expand coverage ← → Restrict coverage

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (193)

Nay (222)

Not voting or present (17)

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.