Skip to content
Their Record

House Roll Call 921, 103rd Congress · July 14, 1994

(HOUSE AGREED TO THE STENHOLM AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE THAT EXTENDS RESCISSION PROCEDURES TO PRESIDENTIAL PROPOSALS TO REPEAL "TARGETED TAX BENEFITS" IN REVENUE BILLS; PROVIDES THAT 50 HOUSE MEMBERS CAN REQUEST A VOTE ON A MOTION TO STRIKE AN INDIVIDUAL RESCISSION FROM THE PRESIDENT'S PROPOSED RESCISSION PACKAGE; PROVIDES THAT THE SPECIAL RESCISSION PROCEDURES ESTABLISHED BY THE SUBSTITUTE ARE PERMANENT; APPLIES THE SPECIAL RESCISSION PROCEDURES PROPOSED BY THE PRESIDENT ANY TIME DURING THE YEAR; DOES NOT APPLY THE EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION PROCEDURES TO ALTERNATIVE RESCISSION PACKAGES PROPOSED BY THE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEES; AND SPECIFIES THAT THE PRESIDENT HAS THE OPTION OF EARMARKING SAVINGS FROM PROPOSED RESCISSIONS FOR DEFICIT REDUCTION.)

Question before the chamber: On Agreeing to the Amendment

298 yea · 118 nayAgreed to20 not voting or present
Democrat121 yea · 120 nay
Republican177 yea · 0 nay
Independent0 yea · 1 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

H.R. 4600 ↗

Expedited Rescissions Act of 1994

Policy area: Economics and Public Finance — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

  • Spending & BudgetA yea counts toward “Fiscal restraint”

    model(0.90): Strengthening presidential rescission procedures promotes deficit reduction and fiscal restraint.

    Tagged by: policy-area:Economics and Public Finance

    Axis: Fiscal expansion ← → Fiscal restraint

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (298)

Nay (121)

Not voting or present (20)

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.