Skip to content
Their Record

House Roll Call 926, 103rd Congress · July 19, 1994

(HOUSE REJECTED THE SANDERS AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO CUT THE AUTHORIZATION LEVEL TO 90 PERCENT OF THE FISCAL YEAR 1994 LEVEL.)

Question before the chamber: On Agreeing to the Amendment

105 yea · 313 nayFailed18 not voting or present
Democrat96 yea · 146 nay
Republican9 yea · 169 nay
Independent1 yea · 0 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

H.R. 4299 ↗

Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995

Policy area: Armed Forces and National Security — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

  • Defense & War PowersA yea counts toward “Military restraint”

    model(0.95): Cutting intelligence authorization to 90 percent reduces military and intelligence spending.

    Tagged by: policy-area:Armed Forces and National Security

    Axis: Military restraint ← → Military expansion

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (106)

Nay (315)

Not voting or present (18)

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.