House Roll Call 937, 103rd Congress · July 21, 1994

(HOUSE REJECTED THE STENHOLM AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE THAT SOUGHT TO SET ANNUAL CAPS ON ENTITLEMENT SPENDING FOR FISCAL YEARS 1996 THROUGH 2000; REQUIRE CUTS IN SPENDING OF $150 BILLION OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS; REQUIRE AUTOMATIC, ACROSS-THE-BOARD CUTS FOR ALL PROGRAMS IF RECONCILIATION LEGISLATION FAILS TO MEET THE ESTABLISHED CAPS; AND PROHIBIT TAX INCREASES OR DISCRETIONARY SPENDING CUTS AS MEANS OF OFFSETTING EXCESS ENTITLEMENT.)

Question before the chamber: On Agreeing to the Amendment

37 yea · 389 nayFailed10 not voting or present

Democrat26 yea · 221 nay

Republican11 yea · 170 nay

Independent0 yea · 1 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

H.R. 4604 ↗

Budget Control Act of 1994

Policy area: Economics and Public Finance — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

Spending & BudgetA yea counts toward “Fiscal restraint”
model(0.95): Setting entitlement spending caps and requiring $150 billion in cuts enforces spending restraint.
Tagged by: policy-area:Economics and Public Finance
Axis: Fiscal expansion ← → Fiscal restraint

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (37)

Nay (392)

Not voting or present (10)

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.