Skip to content
Their Record

House Roll Call 1156, 104th Congress · June 28, 1996

(HOUSE REJECTED THE ANDREWS AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO REQUIRE THAT STATES CONDUCT A COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS WHEN CONTRACTING FOR SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS USUALLY PERFORMED BY EMPLOYEES OF THE STATE.)

Question before the chamber: On Agreeing to the Amendment

123 yea · 280 nayFailed30 not voting or present
Democrat121 yea · 58 nay
Republican1 yea · 222 nay
Independent1 yea · 0 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

H.R. 3675 ↗

Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1997

Policy area: Economics and Public Finance — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

  • Spending & BudgetDirection unreadable — not scored

    excluded:model-unclear (0.90) Requiring cost-benefit analyses has an unclear net fiscal impact.

    Tagged by: policy-area:Economics and Public Finance

    Axis: Fiscal expansion ← → Fiscal restraint

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (123)

Nay (280)

Not voting or present (30)

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.