Skip to content
Their Record

House Roll Call 1178, 104th Congress · July 12, 1996

(HOUSE REJECTED THE GUTKNECHT AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO APPLY A 1.9 PERCENT REDUCTION TO ALL DISCRETIONARY APPROPRIATIONS.)

Question before the chamber: On Agreeing to the Amendment

111 yea · 313 nayFailed9 not voting or present
Democrat9 yea · 183 nay
Republican102 yea · 129 nay
Independent0 yea · 1 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

H.R. 3755 ↗

Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1997

Policy area: Economics and Public Finance — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

  • Spending & BudgetA yea counts toward “Fiscal restraint”

    model(0.95): Yes vote cuts all discretionary appropriations by 1.9 percent.

    Tagged by: policy-area:Economics and Public Finance

    Axis: Fiscal expansion ← → Fiscal restraint

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (111)

Nay (313)

Not voting or present (9)

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.