House Roll Call 185, 104th Congress · March 2, 1995

(HOUSE REJECTED THE GOSS AMENDMENT TO THE CANADY SUBSTITUTE THAT SOUGHT TO INCREASE THE THRESHOLD FOR PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION FROM A 10 PERCENT TO A 30 PERCENT LOSS IN PROPERTY VALUE.)

Question before the chamber: On Agreeing to the Amendment

210 yea · 211 nayFailed13 not voting or present

Democrat160 yea · 29 nay

Republican49 yea · 182 nay

Independent1 yea · 0 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

H.R. 925 ↗

Private Property Protection Act of 1995

Policy area: Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

Civil RightsA yea counts toward “Narrow protections”
model(0.85): Raises the property value loss threshold from 10% to 30%, narrowing compensation eligibility.
Tagged by: policy-area:Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues
Axis: Broaden protections ← → Narrow protections

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (210)

Nay (211)

Not voting or present (13)

Henry Scott BaeslerDid not vote
George E. Brown Jr.Did not vote
John Wiley BryantDid not vote
Henry Barbosa GonzálezDid not vote
Stephen HornDid not vote
Steny H. HoyerDid not vote
Gregory H. LaughlinDid not vote
Matthew G. MartínezDid not vote
John Joseph MoakleyDid not vote
Major R. OwensDid not vote
Steven Harvey SchiffDid not vote
Robert TorricelliDid not vote
Sidney Richard YatesDid not vote

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.