Skip to content
Their Record

House Roll Call 187, 104th Congress · March 3, 1995

(HOUSE REJECTED THE MINETA AMENDMENT TO THE CANADY SUBSTITUTE THAT SOUGHT TO INCREASE THE MINIMUM THRESHOLD FOR PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION FROM 10 PERCENT TO 20 PERCENT LOSS IN PROPERTY VALUE OF THE ENTIRE PARCEL OF PROPERTY.)

Question before the chamber: On Agreeing to the Amendment

173 yea · 252 nayFailed9 not voting or present
Democrat160 yea · 32 nay
Republican12 yea · 220 nay
Independent1 yea · 0 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

H.R. 925 ↗

Private Property Protection Act of 1995

Policy area: Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

  • Civil RightsA yea counts toward “Narrow protections”

    model(0.85): Raises the property value loss threshold from 10% to 20%, narrowing compensation eligibility.

    Tagged by: policy-area:Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues

    Axis: Broaden protections ← → Narrow protections

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (173)

Nay (252)

Not voting or present (9)

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.