Skip to content
Their Record

House Roll Call 608, 104th Congress · August 3, 1995

(HOUSE REJECTED THE SKAGGS AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO DELETE LANGUAGE IN THE BILL THAT PROHIBITS THE USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR POLITICAL ADVOCACY.)

Question before the chamber: On Agreeing to the Amendment

187 yea · 232 nayFailed16 not voting or present
Democrat174 yea · 13 nay
Republican12 yea · 219 nay
Independent1 yea · 0 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

H.R. 2127 ↗

Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1996

Policy area: Economics and Public Finance — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

  • Spending & BudgetDirection unreadable — not scored

    excluded:model-unclear (0.90) Deleting a policy rider on political advocacy is a regulatory policy issue, not a fiscal axis vote.

    Tagged by: policy-area:Economics and Public Finance

    Axis: Fiscal expansion ← → Fiscal restraint

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (187)

Nay (232)

Not voting or present (16)

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.