House Roll Call 629, 104th Congress · September 7, 1995

(HOUSE REJECTED THE SANDERS AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO REDUCE FUNDING FOR THE NATIONAL FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE PROGRAM (OTHER THAN THE CIA RETIREMENT AND DISABILITY SYSTEM FUND) BY LIMITING FUNDING TO NINETY PERCENT OF LAST YEAR'S LEVEL.)

Question before the chamber: On Agreeing to the Amendment

93 yea · 325 nayFailed16 not voting or present

Democrat78 yea · 107 nay

Republican14 yea · 218 nay

Independent1 yea · 0 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

H.R. 2126 ↗

Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1996

Policy area: Armed Forces and National Security — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

Defense & War PowersA yea counts toward “Military restraint”
model(0.95): Voting yes reduces foreign intelligence funding to 90% of the previous year.
Tagged by: policy-area:Armed Forces and National Security
Axis: Military restraint ← → Military expansion

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (93)

Nay (325)

Not voting or present (16)

Sanford D. Bishop, Jr.Did not vote
Rosa L. DeLauroDid not vote
John D. DingellDid not vote
Victor Herbert Fazio Jr.Did not vote
Richard Andrew GephardtDid not vote
Enid Greene WaldholtzDid not vote
Carolyn B. MaloneyDid not vote
Cynthia McKinneyDid not vote
John Joseph MoakleyDid not vote
Constance MorellaDid not vote
Mel ReynoldsDid not vote
Pat RobertsDid not vote
José E. SerranoDid not vote
Norman SisiskyDid not vote
Edolphus TownsDid not vote
Walter R. Tucker IIIDid not vote

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.