Skip to content
Their Record

House Roll Call 87, 104th Congress · February 6, 1995

(HOUSE REJECTED THE WATERS AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO ALLOW THE PRESIDENT TO RESCIND ANY PROVISION WHICH HE DETERMINES WOULD YIELD AT LEAST 20 PERCENT OF ITS BENEFIT TO THE TOP ONE PERCENT OF INCOME EARNERS.)

Question before the chamber: On Agreeing to the Amendment

144 yea · 280 nayFailed10 not voting or present
Democrat141 yea · 51 nay
Republican2 yea · 229 nay
Independent1 yea · 0 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

H.R. 2 ↗

Line Item Veto Act

Policy area: Economics and Public Finance — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

  • Spending & BudgetA yea counts toward “Fiscal restraint”

    model(0.80): Allowing rescissions of high-income provisions reduces fiscal expenditures and targeted tax breaks.

    Tagged by: policy-area:Economics and Public Finance

    Axis: Fiscal expansion ← → Fiscal restraint

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (144)

Nay (280)

Not voting or present (10)

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.