Skip to content
Their Record

House Roll Call 88, 104th Congress · February 6, 1995

(HOUSE REJECTED THE STENHOLM AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE, AMENDING THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET AND IMPOUNDMENT CONTROL ACT OF 1974 TO PROVIDE FOR THE EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN PROPOSED RESCISSIONS OF BUDGET AUTHORITY WHICH PASSED THE HOUSE IN 1994; AND, ENABLE THE PRESIDENT TO CHOOSE BETWEEN THE USE OF A LINE-ITEM VETO PROCEDURE OR EXPEDITED RESCISSION PROCEDURES WHEN PROPOSING RESCISSIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS OR VETOES OF TARGETED TAX BENEFITS.)

Question before the chamber: On agreeing to the Substitute Amendment

156 yea · 266 nayFailed12 not voting or present
Democrat150 yea · 42 nay
Republican5 yea · 224 nay
Independent1 yea · 0 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

H.R. 2 ↗

Line Item Veto Act

Policy area: Economics and Public Finance — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

  • Spending & BudgetA yea counts toward “Fiscal restraint”

    model(0.85): Creating expedited rescission procedures facilitates spending cuts and fiscal restraint.

    Tagged by: policy-area:Economics and Public Finance

    Axis: Fiscal expansion ← → Fiscal restraint

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (156)

Nay (266)

Not voting or present (12)

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.