Skip to content
Their Record

House Roll Call 94, 104th Congress · February 7, 1995

(HOUSE REJECTED THE WATT AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO STRIKE PROVISIONS APPLYING THE "GOOD FAITH" EXCEPTION TO THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE TO WARRANTLESS SEARCHES; AND TO REPLACE IT WITH THE TEXT OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.)

Question before the chamber: On Agreeing to the Amendment

121 yea · 303 nayFailed10 not voting or present
Democrat119 yea · 70 nay
Republican1 yea · 233 nay
Independent1 yea · 0 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

H.R. 666 ↗

Exclusionary Rule Reform Act of 1995

Policy area: Crime and Law Enforcement — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

  • Criminal JusticeA yea counts toward “Reform-oriented”

    model(0.90): Striking the good-faith exception protects Fourth Amendment rights, moving toward reform.

    Tagged by: policy-area:Crime and Law Enforcement

    Axis: Reform-oriented ← → Punitive

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (121)

Nay (303)

Not voting or present (10)

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.