Skip to content
Their Record
← Frank Mascara

Frank Mascara on Civil Rights

DemocratPA

Civil Rights22 votes · 63.4/100 consistent
Broaden protectionsNarrow protections

39 roll calls on this member’s record are tagged Civil Rights. 22 of them counted toward the score above: 13 toward “Broaden protections” and 9 toward “Narrow protections”.

The other 17 did not count: 15 were roll calls whose direction on this issue could not be read confidently — mostly procedural motions — and 2 were ones they did not cast a yea or nay on. They are listed below anyway, marked as not scored, because a filtered list of votes is not a voting record.

DateWhat was voted onVotedCounted as
2002-09-25Abortion Non-Discrimination ActH.R. 4691 · 107th Congress · On PassageDid not voteNot a yea/nay
2002-09-25Abortion Non-Discrimination ActH.R. 4691 · 107th Congress · On Motion to Recommit with InstructionsDid not voteDirection not readable
2002-09-25Providing for Consideration of H.R. 4691, Abortion Non-Discrimination ActH.Res. 546 · 107th Congress · On Agreeing to the ResolutionDid not voteDirection not readable
2001-07-30Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Related Intolerance presents a unique opportunity to address global discriminationH.Res. 212 · 107th Congress · On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Agree, as AmendedYeaDirection not readable
2000-10-02Privacy Commission Act — H R 4049 QUESTION: ON MOTION TO SUSPEND THE RULES AND PASS, AS AMENDED PRIVACY COMMISSION ACTH.R. 4049 · 106th Congress · On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as AmendedYeaBroaden protections
2000-05-08Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the necessity to expedite the settlement process for discrimination claims against the Department of Agriculture brought by African-American farmers — H CON RES 296 QUESTION: ON MOTION TO SUSPEND THE RULES AND AGREE EXPRESSING THE SENSE OF THE CONGRESS REGARDING THE NECESSITY TO EXPEDITE THE SETTLEMENT PROCESS FOR DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS AGAINST THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE BROUGHT BY AFRICAN-AMERICAN FARMERSH.Con.Res. 296 · 106th Congress · On Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeNayDirection not readable
1999-07-15Religious Liberty Protection Act — H R 1691 QUESTION: ON PASSAGE RELIGIOUS LIBERTY PROTECTION ACTH.R. 1691 · 106th Congress · On PassageYeaBroaden protections
1999-07-15H R 1691 AUTHOR(S): NADLER OF NEW YORK SUBSTITUTE AMENDMENT QUESTION: ON AGREEING TO THE AMENDMENT RELIGIOUS LIBERTY PROTECTION ACTH.R. 1691 · 106th Congress · On Agreeing to the AmendmentYeaDirection not readable
1999-03-23Affirming the Congress’ Opposition to All Forms of Racism and Bigotry — H RES 121 QUESTION: ON MOTION TO SUSPEND THE RULES AND AGREE AFFIRMING THE CONGRESS' OPPOSITION TO ALL FORMS OF RACISM AND BIGOTRYH.Res. 121 · 106th Congress · On Motion to Suspend the Rules and AgreeNayDirection not readable
1998-12-19(HOUSE AGREED TO ARTICLE III, OF H. RES. 611: IN HIS CONDUCT WHILE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, IN VIOLATION OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL OATH FAITHFULLY TO EXECUTE THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND, TO THE BEST OF HIS ABILITY, PRESERVE, PROTECT, AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, AND IN VIOLATION OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY TO TAKE CARE THAT THE LAWS BE FAITHFULLY EXECUTED, HAS PREVENTED, OBSTRUCTED, AND IMPEDED THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, AND HAS TO THAT END ENGAGED PERSONALLY, AND THROUGH HIS SUBORDINATES AND AGENTS, IN A COURSE OF CONDUCT OR SCHEME DESIGNED TO DELAY, IMPEDE, COVER UP, AND CONCEAL THE EXISTENCE OF EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY RELATED TO A FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION BROUGHT AGAINST HIM IN A DULY INSTITUTED JUDICIAL PROCEEDING. THE MEANS USED TO IMPLEMENT THIS COURSE OF CONDUCT OR SCHEME INCLUDED ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING ACTS: (1) ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 17, 1997, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON CORRUPTLY ENCOURAGED A WITNESS IN A FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION BROUGHT AGAINST HIM TO EXECUTE A SWORN AFFIDAVIT IN THAT PROCEEDING THAT HE KNEW TO BE PERJURIOUS, FALSE AND MISLEADING. (2) ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 17, 1997, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON CORRUPTLY ENCOURAGED A WITNESS IN A FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION BROUGHT AGAINST HIM TO GIVE PERJURIOUS, FALSE AND MISLEADING TESTIMONY IF AND WHEN CALLED TO TESTIFY PERSONALLY IN THAT PROCEEDING. (3) ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 28, 1997, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON CORRUPTLY ENGAGED IN, ENCOURAGED, OR SUPPORTED A SCHEME TO CONCEAL EVIDENCE THAT HAD BEEN SUBPOENAED IN A FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION BROUGHT AGAINST HIM. (4) BEGINNING ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 7, 1997, AND CONTINUING THROUGH AND INCLUDING JANUARY 14, 1998, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON INTENSIFIED AND SUCCEEDED IN AN EFFORT TO SECURE JOB ASSISTANCE TO A WITNESS IN A FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION BROUGHT AGAINST HIM IN ORDER TO CORRUPTLY PREVENT THE TRUTHFUL TESTIMONY OF THAT WITNESS IN THAT PROCEEDING AT A TIME WHEN THE TRUTHFUL TESTIMONY OF THAT WITNESS WOULD HAVE BEEN HARMFUL TO HIM. (5) ON JANUARY 17, 1998, AT HIS DEPOSITION IN A FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION BROUGHT AGAINST HIM, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON CORRUPTLY ALLOWED HIS ATTORNEY TO MAKE FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS TO A FEDERAL JUDGE CHARACTERIZING AN AFFIDAVIT, IN ORDER TO PREVENT QUESTIONING DEEMED RELEVANT BY THE JUDGE. SUCH FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS WERE SUBSEQUENTLY ACKNOWLEDGED BY HIS ATTORNEY IN A COMMUNICATION TO THAT JUDGE. (6) ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 18 AND JANUARY 20-21, 1998, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON RELATED A FALSE AND MISLEADING ACCOUNT OF EVENTS RELEVANT TO A FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION BROUGHT AGAINST HIM TO A POTENTIAL WITNESS IN THAT PROCEEDING, IN ORDER TO CORRUPTLY INFLUENCE THE TESTIMONY OF THAT WITNESS. (7) ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 21, 23 AND 26, 1998, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON MADE FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS TO POTENTIAL WITNESSES IN A FEDERAL GRAND JURY PROCEEDING IN ORDER TO CORRUPTLY INFLUENCE THE TESTIMONY OF THOSE WITNESSES. THE FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS MADE BY WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON WERE REPEATED BY THE WITNESSES TO THE GRAND JURY, CAUSING THE GRAND JURY TO RECEIVE FALSE AND MISLEADING INFORMATION. IN ALL OF THIS, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON HAS UNDERMINED THE INTEGRITY OF HIS OFFICE, HAS BROUGHT DISREPUTE ON THE PRESIDENCY, HAS BETRAYED HIS TRUST AS PRESIDENT, AND HAS ACTED IN A MANNER SUBVERSIVE OF THE RULE OF LAW AND JUSTICE, TO THE MANIFEST INJURY OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES. WHEREFORE, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, BY SUCH CONDUCT, WARRANTS IMPEACHMENT AND TRIAL, AND REMOVAL FROM OFFICE AND DISQUALIFICATION TO HOLD AND ENJOY ANY OFFICE OF HONOR, TRUST, OR PROFIT UNDER THE UNITED STATES. .)H.Res. 611 · 105th Congress · Adopting the Third ArticleNayDirection not readable
1998-12-19(HOUSE REJECTED ARTICLE II, OF H. RES. 611: IN HIS CONDUCT WHILE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, IN VIOLATION OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL OATH FAITHFULLY TO EXECUTE THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND, TO THE BEST OF HIS ABILITY, PRESERVE, PROTECT, AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, AND IN VIOLATION OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY TO TAKE CARE THAT THE LAWS BE FAITHFULLY EXECUTED, HAS WILLFULLY CORRUPTED AND MANIPULATED THE JUDICIAL PROCESS OF THE UNITED STATES FOR HIS PERSONAL GAIN AND EXONERATION, IMPEDING THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, IN THAT: (1) ON DECEMBER 23, 1997, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, IN SWORN ANSWERS TO WRITTEN QUESTIONS ASKED AS PART OF A FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION BROUGHT AGAINST HIM, WILLFULLY PROVIDED PERJURIOUS, FALSE AND MISLEADING TESTIMONY IN RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS DEEMED RELEVANT BY A FEDERAL JUDGE CONCERNING CONDUCT AND PROPOSED CONDUCT WITH SUBORDINATE EMPLOYEES. (2) ON JANUARY 17, 1998, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON SWORE UNDER OATH TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH IN A DEPOSITION GIVEN AS PART OF A FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION BROUGHT AGAINST HIM. CONTRARY TO THAT OATH, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON WILLFULLY PROVIDED PERJURIOUS, FALSE AND MISLEADING TESTIMONY IN RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS DEEMED RELEVANT BY A FEDERAL JUDGE CONCERNING THE NATURE AND DETAILS OF HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH A SUBORDINATE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE, HIS KNOWLEDGE OF THAT EMPLOYEE'S INVOLVEMENT AND PARTICIPATION IN THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION BROUGHT AGAINST HIM, AND HIS CORRUPT EFFORTS TO INFLUENCE THE TESTIMONY OF THAT EMPLOYEE. IN ALL OF THIS, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON HAS UNDERMINED THE INTEGRITY OF HIS OFFICE, HAS BROUGHT DISREPUTE ON THE PRESIDENCY, HAS BETRAYED HIS TRUST AS PRESIDENT, AND HAS ACTED IN A MANNER SUBVERSIVE OF THE RULE OF LAW AND JUSTICE, TO THE MANIFEST INJURY OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES. WHEREFORE, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, BY SUCH CONDUCT, WARRANTS IMPEACHMENT AND TRIAL, AND REMOVAL FROM OFFICE AND DISQUALIFICATION TO HOLD AND ENJOY ANY OFFICE OF HONOR, TRUST, OR PROFIT UNDER THE UNITED STATES. .)H.Res. 611 · 105th Congress · Adopting the Second ArticleNayDirection not readable
1998-12-19(HOUSE AGREED TO ARTICLE I, OF H. RES. 611: IN HIS CONDUCT WHILE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, IN VIOLATION OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL OATH FAITHFULLY TO EXECUTE THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND, TO THE BEST OF HIS ABILITY, PRESERVE, PROTECT, AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, AND IN VIOLATION OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY TO TAKE CARE THAT THE LAWS BE FAITHFULLY EXECUTED, HAS WILLFULLY CORRUPTED AND MANIPULATED THE JUDICIAL PROCESS OF THE UNITED STATES FOR HIS PERSONAL GAIN AND EXONERATION, IMPEDING THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, IN THAT: ON AUGUST 17, 1998, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON SWORE TO TELL THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH BEFORE A FEDERAL GRAND JURY OF THE UNITED STATES. CONTRARY TO THAT OATH, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON WILLFULLY PROVIDED PERJURIOUS, FALSE AND MISLEADING TESTIMONY TO THE GRAND JURY CONCERNING ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: (1) THE NATURE AND DETAILS OF HIS RELATIONSHIP WITH A SUBORDINATE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE; (2) PRIOR PERJURIOUS, FALSE AND MISLEADING TESTIMONY HE GAVE IN A FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION BROUGHT AGAINST HIM; (3) PRIOR FALSE AND MISLEADING STATEMENTS HE ALLOWED HIS ATTORNEY TO MAKE TO A FEDERAL JUDGE IN THAT CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION; AND (4) HIS CORRUPT EFFORTS TO INFLUENCE THE TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES AND TO IMPEDE THE DISCOVERY OF EVIDENCE IN THAT CIVIL RIGHTS ACTION. IN DOING THIS, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON HAS UNDERMINED THE INTEGRITY OF HIS OFFICE, HAS BROUGHT DISREPUTE ON THE PRESIDENCY, HAS BETRAYED HIS TRUST AS PRESIDENT, AND HAS ACTED IN A MANNER SUBVERSIVE OF THE RULE OF LAW AND JUSTICE, TO THE MANIFEST INJURY OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES. WHEREFORE, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, BY SUCH CONDUCT, WARRANTS IMPEACHMENT AND TRIAL, AND REMOVAL FROM OFFICE AND DISQUALIFICATION TO HOLD AND ENJOY ANY OFFICE OF HONOR, TRUST, OR PROFIT UNDER THE UNITED STATES. .)H.Res. 611 · 105th Congress · Adopting the First ArticleNayDirection not readable
1998-06-04Religious Freedom Constitutional Amendment — (WITH TWO-THIRDS REQUIRED FOR PASSAGE, HOUSE FAILED TO PASS H.J. RES. 78, PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES RESTORING RELIGIOUS FREEDOM.)H.J.Res. 78 · 105th Congress · On PassageNayDirection not readable
1998-06-04Religious Freedom Constitutional Amendment — (HOUSE REJECTED THE SCOTT MOTION TO RECOMMIT THE JOINT RESOLUTION TO THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO REPORT IT BACK WITH AN AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE THAT PROPOSES AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES THAT STATES THAT "CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAWS RESPECTING AN ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION, OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF.".)H.J.Res. 78 · 105th Congress · On Motion to Recommit with InstructionsYeaBroaden protections
1998-06-04(ON DEMAND FOR A DIVISION OF THE QUESTION, HOUSE REJECTED THE BISHOP AMENDMENT, PART 2, THAT SOUGHT TO STRIKE LANGUAGE DEALING WITH THE DENIAL OF "EQUAL ACCESS TO A BENEFIT ON ACCOUNT OF RELIGION" AND INSERT "OR OTHERWISE COMPEL OR DISCRIMINATE AGAINST RELIGION".)H.J.Res. 78 · 105th Congress · On agreeing to Part 2 of the amendmentNayNarrow protections
1998-06-04H.J.R.78 BY ISTOOK (R-OK) -- CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, AMENDMENT RELIGIOUS FREEDOM (ON DEMAND FOR A DIVISION OF THE QUESTION, HOUSE REJECTED THE BISHOP AMENDMENT, PART 1, THAT SOUGHT TO, STRIKE LANGUAGE TO SECURE THE RIGHT TO "ACKNOWLEDGE GOD" AND INSERT THE RIGHT TO "FREEDOM OF RELIGION".)H.J.Res. 78 · 105th Congress · On Agreeing to Part 1 of the amendmentNayNarrow protections
1998-05-19(HOUSE REJECTED THE BECERRA AMENDMENT, H.R. 3534, TO PERMIT POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST PROVISIONS THAT PROHIBIT OR MAKE LESS STRINGENT ANY MANDATE ESTABLISHED TO PROTECT CIVIL RIGHTS.)H.R. 3534 · 105th Congress · On Agreeing to the AmendmentYeaBroaden protections
1998-05-06(HOUSE REJECTED THE RIGGS AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROHIBIT DISCRIMINATION AND PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT TO ANY PERSON OR GROUP BASED IN WHOLE OR IN PART ON RACE, SEX, COLOR, ETHNICITY, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN. .)H.R. 6 · 105th Congress · On Agreeing to the AmendmentNayBroaden protections
1998-04-01H.R.2400 BY SHUSTER (R-PA) -- BUILDING EFFICIENT SURFACE TRANSPORTATION AND EQUITY ACT OF 1998 RECREATIONAL BOATING SAFETY IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1998 SURFACE TRANSPORTATION REVENUE ACT OF 1998 (HOUSE REJECTED THE ROUKEMA AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO STRIKE THE DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES SECTION AND INSERT LANGUAGE ENCOURAGING AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION OR PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT. .)H.R. 2400 · 105th Congress · On Agreeing to the AmendmentNayBroaden protections
1998-02-25H.R.1544 BY GEKAS (R-PA) -- FEDERAL AGENCY COMPLIANCE ACT (HOUSE REJECTED THE JACKSON-LEE AMENDMENT TO EXEMPT THE ADHERENCE TO COURT PRECEDENT IF THE AGENCY MATTER IS UNDER CONSIDERATION BY A U.S. COURT OF APPEALS AND INVOLVES ISSUES OF CIVIL RIGHTS, LABOR RIGHTS, OR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.)H.R. 1544 · 105th Congress · On Agreeing to the AmendmentYeaBroaden protections
1997-11-09Regarding Religious Persecution in Germany — H.C.R.22 BY PAYNE (D-NJ) -- RESOLUTION CONCERNING DISCRIMINATION AGAINST MEMBERS OF MINORITY RELIGIOUS GROUPS (HOUSE FAILED TO SUSPEND THE RULES AND PASS H. CON. RES. 22, AMENDED, EXPRESSING THE SENSE OF THE CONGRESS WITH RESPECT TO THE DISCRIMINATION BY THE GERMAN GOVERNMENT AGAINST MEMBERS OF MINORITY RELIGIOUS GROUPS, PARTICULARLY THE CONTINUED AND INCREASING DISCRIMINATION BY THE GERMAN GOVERNMENT AGAINST PERFORMERS, ENTERTAINERS, AND OTHER ARTISTS FROM THE UNITED STATES ASSOCIATED WITH SCIENTOLOGY.)H.Con.Res. 22 · 105th Congress · Suspend the rules and agree, as amendedNayDirection not readable
1997-07-10Balanced Budget Act of 1997 — H.R.2015 BY KASICH (R-OH) -- BALANCED BUDGET ACT OF 1997 VETERANS RECONCILIATION ACT OF 1997 BUDGET ENFORCEMENT ACT OF 1997 NATIONAL CAPITAL REVITALIZATION AND SELF-GOVERNMENT IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1997 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RETIREMENT PROTECTION ACT OF 1997 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MANAGEMENT REFORM ACT OF 1997 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOND FINANCING IMPROVEMENTS ACT OF 1997 (PUB.L. 105-33, APPROVED 8/05/97) (HOUSE AGREED TO THE SPRATT MOTION TO INSTRUCT CONFEREES (1) ON THE MATTERS PERTAINING TO INCREASING THE AGE OF ELIGIBILITY FOR MEDICARE, REJECT THE PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN SECTION 5611 OF THE SENATE AMENDMENT; (2) ON THE MATTERS PERTAINING TO THE MINIMUM WAGE, WORKER PROTECTIONS, AND CIVIL RIGHTS - (A) INSIST ON PARAGRAPHS (2) AND (3) AND REJECT THE REMAINDER OF SECTIONS 417(F) OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT, AS AMENDED BY SECTIONS 5006 AND 9006 OF THE BILL, AS PASSED THE HOUSE AND (B) REJECT THE PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN SECTIONS 5004 AND 9004 OF THE BILL, AS PASSED BY THE HOUSE.)H.R. 2015 · 105th Congress · Motion to Instruct ConfereesYeaDirection not readable
1997-03-05Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the display of the Ten Commandments by Judge Roy S. Moore, a judge on the circuit court of the State of Alabama — H.C.R.31 BY ADERHOLT (R-AL) -- RESOLUTION REGARDING THE DISPLAY OF THE TEN COMMANDMENTS BY A FEDERAL JUDGE (HOUSE VOTED TO SUSPEND THE RULES AND PASS H. CON. RES. 31, EXPRESSING THE SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING THE DISPLAY OF THE TEN COMMANDMENTS BY JUDGE ROY S. MOORE, A JUDGE ON THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA.)H.Con.Res. 31 · 105th Congress · Suspend the rules and agreeYeaDirection not readable
1996-04-16Condemn Holocaust Doubters — H.RES.316 BY GILMAN (R-NY) -- RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE HOLOCAUST (HOUSE VOTED TO SUSPEND THE RULES AND PASS H. RES. 316, DEPLORING INDIVIDUALS WHO DENY THE HISTORICAL REALITY OF THE HOLOCAUST AND COMMENDING THE VITAL, ONGOING WORK OF THE UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM.)H.Res. 316 · 104th Congress · Suspend the rules and agreeYeaDirection not readable
1995-04-06Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995 — H.R.660 BY SHAW (R-FL) -- HOUSING FOR OLDER PERSONS ACT OF 1995 (HOUSE PASSED H.R. 660, TO AMEND THE FAIR HOUSING ACT TO MODIFY THE EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN FAMILIAL STATUS DISCRIMINATION PROHIBITIONS GRANTED TO HOUSING FOR OLDER PERSONS.)H.R. 660 · 104th Congress · On PassageYeaNarrow protections
1995-04-04Family Privacy Protection Act — (HOUSE PASSED H.R. 1271, TO PROVIDE PROTECTION FOR FAMILY PRIVACY.)H.R. 1271 · 104th Congress · On PassageYeaBroaden protections
1995-04-04(HOUSE REJECTED THE DORNAN AMENDMENT EN BLOC THAT SOUGHT TO PROHIBIT ANY PERSON TO REQUIRE OR OTHERWISE SEEK THE RESPONSE OF A MINOR TO A SURVEY OR QUESTIONNAIRE.)H.R. 1271 · 104th Congress · On agreeing to the Amendments En BlocNayNarrow protections
1995-04-04H.R.1271 BY HORN (R-CA) -- FAMILY PRIVACY PROTECTION ACT OF 1995 (HOUSE AGREED TO THE SOUDER AMENDMENT EN BLOC THAT REQUIRES THAT WRITTEN CONSENT BE OBTAINED BEFORE REQUESTING A MINOR'S PARTICIPATION IN A SURVEY OR QUESTIONNAIRE; REMOVES THE $500 LIMIT ON MONETARY DAMAGES THAT AN INDIVIDUAL CAN CLAIM; AND REMOVES THE EXEMPTION FROM THE REQUIREMENT FOR TESTS INTENDED TO MEASURE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE.)H.R. 1271 · 104th Congress · On Agreeing to the AmendmentYeaBroaden protections
1995-03-07(HOUSE REJECTED THE CONYERS AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO EXEMPT CIVIL RIGHTS CASES FROM THE MANDATORY SANCTIONS ON ATTORNEYS FOR MAKING FRIVOLOUS ARGUMENTS.)H.R. 988 · 104th Congress · On Agreeing to the AmendmentYeaBroaden protections
1995-03-03Private Property Protection Act of 1995 — (HOUSE PASSED H.R. 925, TO COMPENSATE OWNERS OF PRIVATE PROPERTY FOR THE EFFECT OF CERTAIN REGULATORY RESTRICTIONS.)H.R. 925 · 104th Congress · On PassageYeaBroaden protections
1995-03-03(HOUSE REJECTED THE WATT OF NORTH CAROLINA AMENDMENT TO THE CANADY SUBSTITUTE THAT SOUGHT TO STRIKE THE PROVISION REQUIRING COMPENSATION PAYMENTS TO COME OUT OF THE RESPONSIBLE AGENCY'S APPROPRIATION FOR THAT FISCAL YEAR.)H.R. 925 · 104th Congress · On Agreeing to the AmendmentNayBroaden protections
1995-03-03(HOUSE AGREED TO THE GOSS AMENDMENT TO THE CANADY SUBSTITUTE THAT INCREASES THE MINIMUM THRESHOLD FOR PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION FOR LOSS IN PROPERTY VALUE OF ANY PORTION OF THE PROPERTY FROM 10 PERCENT TO 20 PERCENT.)H.R. 925 · 104th Congress · On Agreeing to the AmendmentYeaNarrow protections
1995-03-03(HOUSE REJECTED THE MINETA AMENDMENT TO THE CANADY SUBSTITUTE THAT SOUGHT TO INCREASE THE MINIMUM THRESHOLD FOR PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION FROM 10 PERCENT TO 20 PERCENT LOSS IN PROPERTY VALUE OF THE ENTIRE PARCEL OF PROPERTY.)H.R. 925 · 104th Congress · On Agreeing to the AmendmentYeaNarrow protections
1995-03-02(HOUSE REJECTED THE WYDEN AMENDMENT TO THE CANADY SUBSTITUTE THAT SOUGHT TO RESTRICT ANY ACTIVITY LIKELY TO DIMINISH THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF ANY PRIVATE HOMES AND CLARIFY THE MEANING OF "PRIVATE HOME". .)H.R. 925 · 104th Congress · On Agreeing to the AmendmentYeaDirection not readable
1995-03-02(HOUSE REJECTED THE GOSS AMENDMENT TO THE CANADY SUBSTITUTE THAT SOUGHT TO INCREASE THE THRESHOLD FOR PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION FROM A 10 PERCENT TO A 30 PERCENT LOSS IN PROPERTY VALUE.)H.R. 925 · 104th Congress · On Agreeing to the AmendmentYeaNarrow protections
1995-03-02(HOUSE REJECTED THE PORTER AMENDMENT TO THE CANADY SUBSTITUTE THAT SOUGHT TO REQUIRE THAT COMPENSATION NOT BE PAID TO ANY FEDERAL AGENCY THAT HAS PERFORMED A PRIVATE PROPERTY IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE PARTICULAR REGULATION OR OTHER AGENCY ACTION.)H.R. 925 · 104th Congress · On Agreeing to the AmendmentYeaNarrow protections
1995-03-02H.R.925 BY CANADY (R-FL) -- PRIVATE PROPERTY PROTECTION ACT OF 1995 (HOUSE AGREED TO THE TAUZIN AMENDMENT TO THE CANADY AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE REQUIRING THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO PURCHASE THE PORTION OF A PROPERTY AFFECTED BY AN AGENCY ACTION, AT FAIR MARKET VALUE, IF THE LOSS IN VALUE EXCEEDS 50 PERCENT AND THE OWNER SO REQUESTS; AND LIMITING THE SCOPE OF THE BILL'S COMPENSATION REQUIREMENTS.)H.R. 925 · 104th Congress · On Agreeing to the AmendmentYeaNarrow protections
1995-02-23(HOUSE AGREED TO THE NORTON AMENDMENT, AS AMENDED BY THE MCINTOSH AMENDMENT, THAT EXCLUDES FROM ANY RULEMAKING MORATORIUM ON REGULATORY RULEMAKING ACTIONS THE ESTABLISHMENT OR ENFORCEMENT OF ANY STATUTORY RIGHT THAT PROHIBITS DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF AGE, RACE, RELIGION, GENDER, NATIONAL ORIGIN, OR HANDICAPPED OR DISABILITY STATUS.)H.R. 450 · 104th Congress · On Agreeing to the Amendment, as amendedYeaBroaden protections
1995-01-24(HOUSE AGREED TO THE BECERRA AMENDMENT EN BLOC THAT EXCLUDES FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THE BILL ANY FEDERAL MANDATES THAT ALLOW DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF AGE.)H.R. 5 · 104th Congress · On Agreeing to the AmendmentDid not voteNot a yea/nay

Sorted newest first. “Counted as” is which end of the Broaden protections / Narrow protections axis the vote moved this member toward, using the direction recorded for this issue on that roll call. Open any row to see the full measure, the tally, and the reason that direction was assigned.