House Roll Call 1021, 105th Congress · August 5, 1998

(HOUSE REJECTED THE KUCINICH AMENDMENT THAT SOUGHT TO PROHIBIT ANY FUNDS TO BE USED FOR THE FILING OF A COMPLAINT IN ANY LEGAL ACTION BROUGHT UNDER SPECIFIED SECTIONS OF THE NAFTA IMPLEMENTATION ACT OR THE URUGUAY ROUND AGREEMENTS ACT. .)

Question before the chamber: On Agreeing to the Amendment

200 yea · 228 nayFailed7 not voting or present

Democrat127 yea · 74 nay

Republican72 yea · 154 nay

Independent1 yea · 0 nay

Solid = yea, faded = nay.

The measure

H.R. 4276 ↗

Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999

Policy area: Economics and Public Finance — assigned by Library of Congress subject specialists, not by this site.

How this vote is scored

Which tracked issues this roll call counts toward, and which way a yea vote moves a member on each. Direction is decided per issue, because one bill can push two issues opposite ways.

TradeA yea counts toward “Protectionist”
model(0.85): Blocking funds to enforce or implement free trade agreements pushes toward a protectionist stance.
Tagged by: keyword:nafta
Axis: Protectionist ← → Free trade
Spending & BudgetDirection unreadable — not scored
excluded:model-unclear (0.90) This amendment is a policy rider blocking legal actions under trade agreements; fiscal effect is incidental.
Tagged by: policy-area:Economics and Public Finance
Axis: Fiscal expansion ← → Fiscal restraint

Who voted which way

Every member recorded on this roll call, with the party they sat with at the time.

Yea (200)

Nay (228)

Not voting or present (7)

Vote records come from Voteview (voteview.com); bill titles and policy areas from the congress.gov API. See methodology for how the record was built.